Archive for the 'General' Category

You are currently browsing the archives of Soapbox .

Take a Chance

    Dear Woman standing ahead of me at the Speedway gas station at 7:30 in the morning,
            Sweetie, I have something to tell you, and you're not gonna want to hear it, but it's the truth: you are NOT going to win the lottery.
I don't care how many times you play your boyfriends' birth date, and whether you go straight or boxed or what cute pictures are on the card you scratch. You are not going to win.

       Normally I couldn't care less what you do with your money and your time, but right now, I am skating awfully close to being late for work. I just stopped in to grab some coffee, thinking I could run in and run right out but I did not count on being in line behind you and your 2 packs of Marlboro- no the soft packs,  and a Snicker bar, and lets see… how can I pay my stupidity tax today? So many bright and shiney tickets to choose from,  all with different names and different gimmicks, like the midway games at the fair with the crappy, sawdust-stuffed prizes, and then there are numbers, so many numbers to choose!
     I sighed heavily a few times but you did not get the hint and kept laughing and joking with the clerk about how you've just got to start the day with your tickets. Look, we all have something we start our day with. Me, it's this coffee I'm drinking even though I haven't yet paid for.  For the guy in the clothes of a road crew  it's apparently a morning slice of pepperoni pizza and Budweiser (ok, that's a scary thought… I"m gonna tell myself the Bud is going in his truck for lunch break) For the lady behind him in the Michelin man parka, sprayed-on jeans and gold stilletto boots it's probably that doughnut…
     You know, you're like the person with 47 items and 48 coupons, half of them expired, who gets in the 12 items or less express lane in front of you at the grocery store.
      Seriously, lady! This is a convenience store! You're are being very inconvenient right now. You are not going to win! I know, it sucks. But it's true. You could turn around and give me the 20 dollars you are spending on lottery, and be just as well off.
      In fact, tell you what: here's a dollar. Take it to walk out the door right now  and you will get more free money from this deal than you are ever going to get from a lottery ticket.

      Note to self- tomorrow, I am driving thru Tim Hortons.

Posted by Tracy on Jan 31st 2012 | Filed in General | Comments (0)

Sins of the Fathers

The sins of the fathers are just water under the bridge these days. Forgive and forget!
But oh, God sends the flood to punish the sins of the mothers.

    He does it by creating new life and then breaking it, in ways large and small-
cleft lips, twisted limbs, unseeing eyes, wasting disorders, short-circuiting brains tiny holes in tiny, hummingbird hearts~
this is how the Lord of hosts, who controls the motions of the heavens whose love for the world football players write under their eyes on game days… this is how He punishes a woman.  
    So sayeth the smug politician who vigilantly guards the gates of decency against the incursion of women looking for health services and hoping to limit their family to the number of children they can afford to feed and clothe decently.
    Armed with muddy theology about divine wrath, this man- who can never know the joys and fears of carrying new life-  solemnly intones that God has revealed to him that handicapped children are divine punishment upon a woman for the sin abortion. Terminate your pregnancy, even to save your own life, and God will punish your selfishness by sending you his most precious gift: a child
… with disabilities.

     I am only a flawed and sinful daughter of Eve, so perhaps this is why I am so confused by the fuzzy math of this equation.
 ~ Why does God not similarly punish those who kill children who have already been born,
 ~ and why do so many women who have abortions go on to have healthy, happy children,
 ~  and why have so many mothers of disabled children never had an abortion at all
 ~ and how in heaven could a new, sweet life, however challenged and challenging,  ever be a punishment at all?
Why would a loving God damage a child when the child is not the sinner?
And just where exacty do the sins of the fathers figure into this divine calculus?

   If this is a punishment then, in overwhelming numbers, we are missing the message, Lord. Most of us feel just as blessed by disabled children as by the ones born whole. There are some who even seek out and adopt these instruments of divine punishment and find their lives immeasurably enriched by them.
     Our children are not weapons and their impediments are not punishments: they just draw a different rubric for success.
    When simple tasks for others are challenges the size of a wheelchair for your child, in a house where surgeries are more common than birthdays, each new accomplishment, however small, gets taped to the refrigerator of the parent's heart to be exclaimed over,  bragged about to friends and neighbors with aching pride. When limbs don't want to obey the brain's commands, the child who walks across the room becomes your olympic hero. When words are difficult, each "I love you" is a diamond sharp enough to cut glass.

   So tell me, someone, why would the God of love harm an innocent, unborn child just to make a point to a woman whose sin was harming an innocent, unborn child? Why not just make her infertile,  strike her dumb, visit a plague of insects or send one of his tried but true lightning bolt? Isn't there a clearer way for a deity to get his message across?
     I am still confused about why God killed so many abortion-less people with hurricane Katrina because of abortion. Or was it about all those wanton Mardi Gras parades? Even the peddlers of fire and brimstone can't agree,  which doesn't sound like very omnipotent communication for the guy who made the heavens and the earth.
     Still, we are supposed to believe that God, the all-knowing, all powerful deity, whose eye is upon even the sparrow, has really lousy aim and just fires random shot-gun blasts of hate at his precious children. And while we wade through the rivers of blood and pain we're supposed to figure out what in the hell he got ticked off about this time and who in the hell he was shooting at.
    God, who can put his son's face on a taco shell can't just text someone to tell them to knock it off or draw a giant crop circle in Nebraska with the international symbol for No Gay Marriage.  No, he sends spina bifida and tay sachs- a lifetime of pain to someone who did no wrong, just because he doesn't like their mother.

    Well if you have any messages for me, Lord, really,…
a simple burning bush will do the trick.

Posted by Tracy on Jan 20th 2012 | Filed in General,The Daily Rant | Comments (3)

Not Enough Stars

He was my hero.

    He seemed larger than life, almost a legend, like Paul Bunyan: a tall, blond, curly-haired, blue-eyed teddy bear of a man, affectionately (and accurately) known as "Big John" Dwyer.

    I met him when he was a counselor my first year at Vinton County camp, when I was 11. He was not my counselor, but I liked him right away. How could you not? He always seemed so full of energy and joy.  Among all the wonderful people I met there, and all the counselors whom I wanted to grow up and be just like, John stood out.
    One night there was a group campfire down by the shelter house, with story-telling and singing. John was sitting near me, and heard me singing harmony. He scooted over closer, complimented me on my singing and we talked about the music we learned from our families. We sang "O Danny Boy" together, his deep voice and my piping treble, and laughed.
   The night was very clear, and while the fire kept my front side warm, my back was cold. John tucked me up against him to stay warm, put a strong arm around me. We looked up at the sky together. I remember wondering aloud why it was that there were so many more stars here than there were at home. He explained to me the effect cities have on your ability to see the stars.
        "Sometimes you have to go away from so many people, get off by yourself, in order to be able to really see" he said and pointed out some constellations to me.
    After a while I got tired and laid my head against him, listened to his  voice rumble quietly through his chest as he spoke, just the way I liked to do with my grandfather. I nearly went to sleep, so warm and comfortable and safe it was there.
   That's my strongest, most enduring memory of John Dwyer: strong as an oak, a gentle, loving soul who kept a scrawny little girl warm one night and showed her the stars. That's the one I hold on to.

   Tonight I learned that John Dwyer died in 2009, right here in Columbus, in fact, after a long and often unsuccessful battle with bipolar disorder.
    I knew he had some sort of mental illness. I was there that night at camp, a few years after i met him, when he had a breakdown, left a camp full of frightened, grief-stricken people behind.

    It was the last night of camp and we were having our closing ceremony where everyone got a chance to say a personal goodbye to everyone else. But before I ever got a chance to say goodbye to John, he was gone.
    There had been some talk among the campers in the last few days. The kids in John's campsite said he was occasionally… erratic, unsettled…. not the John they used to know. The counselors seemed concerned but wouldn't talk about it with us. And like typical kids, most of us assumed it couldn't be anything too serious. I mean, this was Big John Dwyer! We all looked up to him, literally and physically. Maybe he was having a rough time about something, but he'd work it out.
    And then suddenly there was a commotion, and John was storming off, but taking someone with him: one of his campers (and my best friend, as it happened). He wasn't exactly dragging her, wasn't really holding her hostage, but he wouldn't let her go, and he wouldn't come back to the group. My memories of exactly what occurred are a little fuzzy. Maybe I don't want to remember. Mostly I recall the emotion: confusion, anxiety and fear. It billowed and snapped through the milling campers like a flag moves in a windstorm. Counselors tried to pull their campsites together and calm them as other staff quietly spoke to John.
   I do remember very clearly the priest, Father Al, talking in quiet tones like you would use to coax a frightened, snapping dog.
        "Let go of her arm and come back to the group John. Yes, you can. Take a hand John. Take a hand, if you care to".
    I remember that phrase, "Take a hand, John" and that image- Al reaching out his hand, and John looking at it. The only sounds were quiet weeping from some of the girls, and all of us were mentally straining, willing  him to reach out and take it, to be big John Dwyer again, not this frightening, frightened stranger.

    But he couldn't. He wanted to, I"m sure. He wanted to be our friend and mentor and role model again, but that ability was stolen from him by the hideous alchemy in his brain that stole him from us, stole him from himself. He shouted. He wept. He finally let go of my friend's arm, and ran off, jumped in his car and drove away, leaving a camp full of shell-shocked teenagers behind.
    We tried to resume the closing ceremony, but it was more painful than ever. I think everyone cried. After it was over, a bunch of us decided to stay up all night watch the sun rise. We built a campfire and huddled around it, talking for hours, trying to keep the darkness at bay. For the world was a much darker place that night.
     More monsters. Fewer stars.

    In the morning we were told that John's mother reported that he had successfully made it home that night and agreed to see a doctor. Like the kids we were, most of us breathed a sigh of relief and pretended that we thought it would be as simple as that, that prayer and a good doctor would fix what was broken.
    But of course it didn't.

     I never saw or heard of John again after that moment in 1974 when I watched the dust kicked up by his car as he raced out of our lives. I have thought of him with great affection from time to time and hoped he was doing well. But from what I've pieced together, mostly, he wasn't. He was hospitalized many times and was living in a group home right here in Columbus before he died. The obituary didn't mention any illness at all and I cannot help but wonder if he didn't end his own life, to escape his pain at last. But whether or not his illness caused his death, it certainly took his life. Years and years of it. It took his career, probably took from him the chance for a wife and family. It took him and never completely gave him back.
     So many beautiful hearts, dancing on broken glass, leaving footprints of pain behind them.

    And I can't help but wish that I had known he was so near. I would have liked to go to visit him. I'm sure it would have been very painful. I doubt he would have  remembered me, and who knows- maybe not even the place I knew him from. But I still wish I had known, so I could have reached out a hand, even if he could never have taken it.

 

    Next summer some of us are trying to arrange some sort of a camp reunion to get together with our fellow aging alumni from the deep woods of Vinton County and talk about the old days.
    I know, on that day, I will raise a glass and offer a toast to big John Dwyer, and to getting away from too many people so you can see the stars.

  
    

Posted by Tracy on Dec 29th 2011 | Filed in General | Comments (2)

Bulls Eye!

    The reactions of Sarah Palin and the extreme-right media to last week’s horrible events have been predictable and instructive. They both came out swinging against the true enemy- progressives- and spoke up in brave defense of the real victim, which was not those who were attacked in Tucson, but was, of course, Sarah Palin.
 
   It seems clear from their reactions that Palin and her camp genuinely do not understand the criticism they are getting over this and can only explain it as the left-wing "lame-stream" media being out to get them. That's because for them, the eye of every storm and the subject of every event is Sarah Palin. They live in a  Palin-centric world and can't understand that the rest of us do not. And so, from the land where other things still matter, I offer this explanation for at least my outrage.
 
     Whatever your opinion on whether she should or should not have posted rifle-scope bulls-eyes over the districts she wanted defeated (many of whom subsequently had office windows and doors smashed) what Sarah Palin clearly should not have done was to grab for the spotlight on the very day when America’s hearts and minds should have been turned to those who were hurting in Arizona.  Instead of simply expressing grief and her prayers for healing  the nation, she called for the cameras to express her outrage over her own suffering in the most venal and self-absorbed way imaginable.
 
    “But Sarah was being attacked unfairly” her defenders cry. “People were saying she was responsible for this tragedy!”
     Indeed. While "free speech" does not mean speech that is free of consequences, she was certainly not directly responsible for that shooting, and such a charge, where it was made, was unfair. (Most were not saying that, only that she employs violent rhetoric far too casually) 
 
    Still, it was probably an uncomfortable position she found herself in. Gee, I wonder if maybe President Obama doesn’t feel the same when he gets accused- by Palin herself!-  of planning to let handicapped babies die and setting up “death panels” to kill off old people?  Oh he has walked in Sarah’s victim shoes and then some.  
    He also knows just how it feels to have one of those “cross-hairs” on his back, after Sarah whipped up campaign crowds to such a frenzy of hatred against him that some were shouting “kill him!”… and then winked at the cameras.
 
    But did he step up to the podium in Tucson and talk about his suffering? Did he try to make sure we all felt sorry for him that day,  for having to appear in public with your loved ones, knowing that national figures are getting obscenely rich from calling you Hitler? Or did he do what a true leader does: put aside his own personal situation, focus on the humanity that unites us, rise above differences and try to lead us all- progressives and conservatives and all the folks in between- to a place of healing?
 
    Palin should have at least tried to do the same. If nothing else, she could have kept her mouth shut. It often shows a fine command of the language to know when to say nothing. She could have tried to keep the focus where it belonged- on the families and the community that had been wounded. (Reality check Sarah: a woman whose district you "targeted" has a hole in her head, and grieving parents are about to bury their child.Your own personal angst, while real to you, should have been secondary.)
    Doing that would have demonstrated leadership, which something Sarah can't even fake, because she fundamentally does not understand it. So she went on the attack and whined for national attention over her own small pain, because she thinks a leader is whoever has the biggest mouth and grabs the most attention.
 
    In her defense, being told that you should have toned down your rhetoric IS exactly like being accused of drinking baby’s blood as part of a dark religious ritual… isn’t it? Apparently it is to the extreme right, who defended her mis-appropriation of the term “blood libel” by trying to co-opt yet another huge genocidal horror and shrink it down to fit in their own pathetic little victimized pocket, calling media criticism a “pogrom”.
 
    Perhaps next we’ll hear that white Christian conservatives are being “lynched” and forced to “walk a Trail of Tears” because sorry slaves and Indians, no one can be allowed to have suffered more than they do. They do not count their blessings; rather they magnify their paper-cuts into the wounds of martyrs. See how they bleed, and how their suffering makes them superior!
 
     Hyperbole is all too common in America.  It happens every day through use of simple expressions, like the hungry businessman who says he is “starving” when he has no concept of what actual starvation is like. Certainly by saying it he intends no disrespect to famine victims!
     But I expect that if that same businessman who missed lunch had occasion to visit Africa and to witness true victims of starvation: match-stick thin parents and their listless, bloated babies, he would never use that term casually again.
    And isn’t this all we ask of each one of us in the wake of the Tucson shooting: that we think more before we speak, and consider that our words have meaning? For if they do not, why do we  bother to speak them?
    Either your calls for an “armed and dangerous” citizenry and “second amendment remedies” mean you are actually prepared to see the blood of children in the street… or you know that your words are only hot air!

    In which case, please, just exercise your right to remain silent.

 
Update: Several media outlets are carrying the story that Sarah Palin's camp reports that death threats against her are up "substantially" since the media started talking about her use of violent rhetoric.
    Death threats against anyone are serious and inexcusable, but two things are worth noting about this claim. One is that, in their outrage over the danger Sarah is now in, are they not proving the point progressives seek to make about the power of words and the potential danger of violent rhetoric? Or are they saying that only rhetoric from the left is dangerous, and "jokes" about poisoning the Speaker of the House or shooting the President from the right are completely benign?
     The second thing worth noting is that Palin has not reported these threats to the police or FBI and offers no corroberation for her claims. If Palin is, in fact receiving so many threats, she is putting her family and staff in grave danger by not alerting law enforcement about this.

Posted by Tracy on Jan 15th 2011 | Filed in General,The Daily Rant | Comments (0)

The Party is Over

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/10/tea-party-leader-defends-attack-lawmaker-muslim/

Dear members of the Tea "We want to defend the constitution against you liberals" Party:

      Since you're so fond of the constitution, you might want to investigate a little thing called the first amendment. Oh, I know, you just LOVE the first amendment when you've said some horribly racist or homophobic thing  or are encouraging people to instigate armed insurrection against the duly elected government and don't want to get nailed for it. Freedom of speech! Only Nazis believe in political correctness! 
      But even if you insist on believing that the Establishment clause of the first amendment was not intended to create a "separation of church and state" (after all, what does that commie Thomas Jefferson know about the Constitution?) it does say that there can be NO religious litmus test for public office.

    In other words, despite what Judson Phillips, head of Tea Party Nation says, you cannot remove congressman Keith Ellison from office simply because he's a Muslim. I know, I know, 9/11, hate our freedoms, kill the infidel, blah blah blah I repeat, you cannot remove him from office simply for being a member of a religion that you don't like.  
    This is actually a good thing. No, really. This is part of what makes America great. I bet. Because, you know what, out of the billions and billions of Christians in the world, there are a LOT out there that I don't like, and you probably don't either! The ones who use God as a shield to hide behind while they are hating, oppressing, attacking and even killing innocent people, just for starters. How about the KKK and Christian Identity folks who thinks God made blacks as "mud people"? How about the ones who say that God killed all those innocent people with Hurricane Katrina because Mardi Gras is too gay?! I really hate that.

     Never would I suggest that a person who is Catholic is unfit for public office because some Catholic priests attack children like wolves and some Catholic bishops and cardinals keep throwing those wolves back in the lambs' pen. Never would I say that all Baptists are evil just because Fred Phelps is a pustulant boil on the face of humanity.

      So tell this guy he is wrong. Tell him he does not speak for you. Tell him that it is a violation of everything America stands for, and that this intolerance is damaging to this nation and far more dangerous than a person who calls God by a different name.
     Use that free speech and speak up! Make one of your famous signs and refuse to accept the idea that only members of certain religions- and only the right members of that religion ('cause I"m pretty sure my kind of Christianity would get me kicked out of Judson Phillips' America!) are capable of serving in a secular, civil government.

    Look, I understand that both the democratic and Republican parties have you frustrated and angry. Me too.  And it was fun, wasn't it? All the rallies and signs, all the excuses to shout and let out your frustrations? But the party's over. It's time to stop and think before the election. Don't wait until the morning after when you'll have to look in the mirror, see your rumpled hair and bleary eyes and wonder what in the hell you did to yourself and your reputation last night.
    Ask yourself- is this who you want to be- the party that wants to create a rich, white male theocracy where evolution is taught as a "fringe theory" and we judge people on how straight they are, how white they are and how many guns they own? You want to be the party that believes the civil rights act went too far, the party that throws people in handcuffs because they ask inconvenient questions? Were you really out there marching to create a party that demands budget restraint while writing blank checks and belligerently asserts their right to offend and demean everyone who doesn't look like them?

     We already have the Republican party for that. Please, offer us something new.
    
      Thanks.
     Sincerely, your friend,

                   Rational America

Posted by Tracy on Oct 28th 2010 | Filed in General,The Daily Rant | Comments (0)

« Prev - Next »